Facts, Theories & Debates
Paleontology is a science of discussion and argument. For paleontologists, this is fun, and it helps their minds expand and think of new possibilities. Plenty of subjects are under debate, and it's interesting to see how the same fossil evidence is used to support various positions.
Also, as more and more evidence is discovered, hypotheses change. Just as our concept of the shape of the earth changed (and finally was proven when we could see it from a distance), paleo debates shift over time from hypotheses to theories to facts. (Sometimes this happens in geologic time!)
Popular T. rex debates: Wishbones, scavenger / predator, T. rex speed, gender.
Paleontologists usually start out as either geologists, who study the earth's layers, or biologists, who study living animals, or botanists, who study plants. They also have to know about chemistry - the building blocks of life. And physics - how our world works. And engineering - the design and building of structures. Once they know these ways of thinking, they can decode what they find in the earth's layers.
Here's a story to show how paleontologists think. You can do this, too, as soon as you discover a question that needs an answer. Our example is: are birds the descendants of dinosaurs?
- Sir Richard Owen, in 1842, noticed that some dinosaur's feet looked like birds' feet. He was the guy to coin the term Dinosauria.
- In 1861, Archaeopteryx was discovered. It looked like a bird with some dinosaur parts - but scientists decided that since it had "bird-only" characteristics (feathers, wishbone), and dinosaurs did not, the two could not be related. They said Archaeopteryx was the "missing link" to something else.
- Nobody thought much about this situation for 100 years, until John Ostrom, in the 1960s, noticed that Deinonychus - definitely a dinosaur - had bird characteristics. At this same time, Bob Bakker postulated that theropods were just too much like birds to be slow, boring reptiles. Dinosaurs got a face lift when Bob started drawing them with feathers.
- In the next decades, dinosaur fossils were found with more and more bird characteristics, including foot and wrist and tail configurations. And wishbones. And feathers. With each new connection, the "bird-only" definition shrank down to nothing.
- Finally, most scientists looked at the evidence and agreed that the two groups - meat-eating dinosaurs and birds - were so similar that they had to be very closely related.
- The geologic timeline shows when birds first appeared. The way it works is that birds and some later theropods developed at the same time, from similar theropod ancestors.
- The big deal: does this mean that the name Dinosauria is actually inaccurate? The problem is that theropod dinosaurs and other dinosaurs aren't as closely related as theropods and birds! This means that maybe long-necked sauropods are SOMETHING; Triceratops, duckbills, and others in their group are SOMETHING ELSE; and theropods and birds are SOMETHING ELSE AGAIN.
This story shows how one hypothesis after another was developed as evidence mounted. Scientists used biology, geology, and evolution to finally arrive at their conclusion - and more new questions.